nanog mailing list archives
Re: Update to BCP-38?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 08:20:22 +0900
Stephen Satchell wrote:
You still need a IPv6 version of RFC 1812. Make it as clean as possible. Use an ax instead of a XACTO knife on the current draft. What is the minimum necessary things that a generic IPv6 router MUST do?
As for requirements for IPv6 routers, how do you think about the
following requirement by rfc4443?
Originating a Packet Too Big Message makes an exception to one of the
rules as to when to originate an ICMPv6 error message. Unlike other
messages, it is sent in response to a packet received with an IPv6
multicast destination address, or with a link-layer multicast or
link-layer broadcast address.
rfc1812 says:
4.3.2.7 When Not to Send ICMP Errors
An ICMP error message MUST NOT be sent as the result of receiving:
o A packet destined to an IP broadcast or IP multicast address, or
o A packet sent as a Link Layer broadcast or multicast, or
with reasons.
IPv6 specification is fatally broken in various ways.
Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 02)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
