nanog mailing list archives
Re: Update to BCP-38?
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 00:08:17 -0400
On Sat, 05 Oct 2019 07:01:58 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
One of a stupidity, among many, of IPv6 is that it assumes links have millions or billions of mostly immobile hosts
Can somebody hand me a match? There's a straw man argument that needs to be set afire here.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Update to BCP-38?, (continued)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? William Herrin (Oct 04)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mike Meredith via NANOG (Oct 08)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Rich Kulawiec (Oct 08)