nanog mailing list archives

Re: sfps from fs dot com

From: Carl Peterson <carl-lists () portnetworks com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 10:42:09 -0500

We have had some failures with 10G BiDi optics coded for Juniper.  We buy a
ton of other stuff from FS but for optics we have moved over to Approved
Optics for everything but active ethernet residential subscribers.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:33 AM Nicholas Warren <nwarren () barryelectric com>
wrote:

Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?

Current thread:

Re: sfps from fs dot com, (continued)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
  - Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Carl Peterson (Sep 20)
  - Re: sfps from fs dot com Nikolas Geyer (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Michel Py (Sep 20)