nanog mailing list archives

Re: sfps from fs dot com


From: Neil Hanlon <neil () shrug pw>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:06:08 -0400

I've got a whole bunch running with no issues.. Mostly MM/850nm though, so
maybe a bit different than their SM stuff. Also have a handful (literally)
of the SM ones, and haven't had any issues (yet).

Only "problem" I've had is a copper SFP from them which may have burned out
and fried a switchport... oops.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:01 AM Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog () lixfeld ca>
wrote:


On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote:

In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see
--, but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the
price, it can be a "successful" business model.

For someone who doesn't want to deal with outages, call-volume, hands
tickets, truck-rolls, and has money to burn, there are better alternatives.

Indeed.  My tune would be very different if we had 1:50 fail in the field.

Current thread: