nanog mailing list archives
Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:27:55 -0800
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 9:05 AM ic <lists () benappy com> wrote:
In my experience, threading is done by clients looking for the In-Reply-To: header, not subject. Subject is a heuristic fallback, in case In-Reply-To is absent.
Correct, they use the In-Reply-To and References headers to thread the emails. Subject line change is a heuristic, not for threading the emails but for -breaking- the thread. It's a good heuristic. Unless the sender is doing something asinine, changing the subject line signals their intent to start a new conversation. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/
Current thread:
- 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Abraham Y. Chen (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Jethro Binks (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Brielle (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Pim van Stam (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions William Herrin (Dec 16)
- RE: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Kord Martin (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions ic (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions William Herrin (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Joel Esler via NANOG (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Brie (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Tom Beecher (Dec 16)
