nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC
From: Peter Beckman <beckman () angryox com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:44:59 -0500
Agreed! Slack should probably move away from the custom domain model, and go with slack.com/w/bjornbjorn moving forward. On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:54 AM Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:I assume you know which names you are going to serve?how would they be able to serve: footgun.slack.com bjornbjorn.slack.com ilovecorn.slack.com so immediately without that wildcard though? :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman () angryox com https://www.angryox.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Rafael Elvira via NANOG (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Peter Beckman (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15: 00 UTC John Levine (Feb 04)
- Simplified BGP peering solution Josh Saul (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Laura Smith via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Mike Hammett (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Jon Lewis (Feb 07)
- RE: Simplified BGP peering solution Adam Thompson (Feb 07)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Shumon Huque (Feb 04)
