nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simplified BGP peering solution
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 07:56:44 -0600 (CST)
I think you need a bit more definition. ISPs as in full-route providers? Any external BGP peer? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Saul" <josh () netris ai> To: nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, February 4, 2022 8:02:12 PM Subject: Simplified BGP peering solution How many active ISPs are most of the people on this list dealing with? 1-2 - I'm an end user just trying to load balance 3-5 - I'm aggressively looking for the best paths for my "customer" traffic 6-20 - I have a meet-me POP room or a specific business need for so many connections 21+ - I'm an ISP Thank you!
Current thread:
- Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Rafael Elvira via NANOG (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Peter Beckman (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15: 00 UTC John Levine (Feb 04)
- Simplified BGP peering solution Josh Saul (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Laura Smith via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Mike Hammett (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Jon Lewis (Feb 07)
- RE: Simplified BGP peering solution Adam Thompson (Feb 07)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Shumon Huque (Feb 04)
