nanog mailing list archives
Re: Amazon peering revisited
From: Lincoln Dale <ltd () interlink com au>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 09:20:13 -0800
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 8:22 AM Kelly Littlepage via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
Hi all, a nanog thread started on November 23, 2018 discussed the challenges of getting Amazon peering sessions turned up. Has anyone had luck since/does anyone have a contact they could refer me to — off-list or otherwise? The process of getting PNI in place with other CSPs was straightforward, but I haven't heard back from AWS after a month and several follow-ups. Our customers would really benefit from us getting this sorted.
There are many folks that here that are in AWS. Assuming you have followed what is in https://aws.amazon.com/peering/ (and https://aws.amazon.com/peering/policy/) then send me details privately about what/when/who and I'll reach out internally to the relevant folks.
Current thread:
- Re: Amazon peering revisited Lincoln Dale (Feb 03)
- RE: Amazon peering revisited Kevin Burke (Feb 04)
- Re: Amazon peering revisited Mike Hammett (Feb 04)
- Re: Amazon peering revisited Martin Hannigan (Feb 04)
- Re: Amazon peering revisited Andras Toth (Feb 04)
- Re: Amazon peering revisited Mike Hammett (Feb 04)
- Re: Amazon peering revisited Eric Kuhnke (Feb 05)
- RE: Amazon peering revisited Don Fanning (Feb 05)
- RE: Amazon peering revisited Don Fanning (Feb 05)
- RE: Amazon peering revisited Kevin Burke (Feb 04)
