nanog mailing list archives
Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock
From: Sylvain Baya <abscoco () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 10:54:27 +0100
Dear NANOG-ers, Hope this email finds you in good health! Please see my comments below, inline... Le mardi 15 mars 2022, <bzs () theworld com> a écrit :
Hi Barry, Thanks for your email, brother!
But the RIRs are the ones fielding requests for IPv4 space, and have some notion of how policy implementation might work in practice, so should have a lot of useful input.
...of course, it appears that RIRs have the opportunity to add their useful inputs, as Impact Analysis Report (IAR); during the Policy Development Process (PDP) initiated by the *appropriate* [1] Internet community. They explain it themselves here [2]. __ [1]: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7020> [2]: <https://www.nro.net/accountability/rir-accountability/q-and-a/> Shalom, --sb.
On March 14, 2022 at 00:45 niels=nanog () bakker net (Niels Bakker) wrote:
> * bzs () theworld com (bzs () theworld com) [Mon 14 Mar 2022, 00:31 CET]:
> >Personally I'd rather hear from the RIRs regarding the value or not
> >of making more IPv4 space such as 240/4 available. They're on the
> >front lines of this.
>
> You've got your policy development process diagram upside down. The
> community decides what the RIRs implement. They're not in touch with
> merchant silicon manufacturers.
>
>
> -- Niels.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs () TheWorld com |
http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
-- Best Regards ! __ baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure> Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/> __ #LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!» #MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement «Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)
Current thread:
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock, (continued)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 11)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin (Mar 11)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 12)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Saku Ytti (Mar 13)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Joe Maimon (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Levine (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Niels Bakker (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs (Mar 14)
- Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Sylvain Baya (Mar 15)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 15)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Mark Andrews (Mar 15)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 16)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Mark Andrews (Mar 16)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs (Mar 15)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Fred Baker (Mar 13)
