nanog mailing list archives
Re: Distributed Router Fabrics
From: "Jakob Heitz \(jheitz\) via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:15:14 +0000
Any-to-any connectivity is an O(x^2) (quadratic) problem. When you build a fabric, you can add new pizza-boxes in a linear fashion as long as the existing boxes have spare ports to plug in the new boxes. As soon as the spare ports run out, the quadratic hits. Then the choices are either: * Reduce any-to-any bandwidth to recover spare ports. * Replace all the boxes by larger ones. * Add a tier. Adds hops and increases convergence. Kind Regards, Jakob -----Original Message----- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:06:36 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> I've noticed that the whitebox hardware vendors are pushing distributed router fabrics, where you can keep buying pizza boxes and hooking them into a larger and larger fabric. Obviously, at some point, buying a big chassis makes more sense. Does it make sense building up to that point? What are your thoughts on that direction?
Current thread:
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics, (continued)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Phil Bedard (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Matthew Petach (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 25)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Randy Bush (Dec 26)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Randy Bush (Dec 26)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 26)
