nanog mailing list archives
Re: Distributed Router Fabrics
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:27:40 -0600 (CST)
*nods* Yeah, I knew that's how a traditional chassis worked. In a distributed setup, you have the option for a single "line card", which obviously doesn't happen in the traditional chassis world. I do see in a DDCv2 document where they briefly mention 2 compute boxes, so now that makes sense. I had to look up some of the acronyms because the document didn't define them within itself. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2024 4:51:45 PM Subject: Re: Distributed Router Fabrics
In a distributed fabric, where is the traditional control plane run? Say I've got 100 BGP sessions of upstream,peer, and downstream across ten routers. Is each pizza box grinding this out on its own, or is the work done on the x86 box mentioned in the larger installations?one way to think of it is that each pizza box (customer facing ports) recognizes control plane messages (e.g. port 179) and "punts" them to the control plane box, aka routing engine.
fwiw, that is pretty much what line cards on a big-box fabric do, punt to the RE. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics, (continued)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 25)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- RE: Distributed Router Fabrics Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Phil Bedard (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Matthew Petach (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 25)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Randy Bush (Dec 26)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Randy Bush (Dec 26)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 26)
