nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers
From: Willy Manga <willym () manbene net>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:00:48 +0400
Hi Jean, On 24/12/2024 03:33, Jean Franco wrote:
Hi Folks, I'm trying to achieve total redundancy on a multihomed environment: ISP 1 <=> Router 1 <= X => Router 2 <=> ISP 2 Where X is my Network. [...] I would like to do a failover model, where if one ISP goes down the other would take over. Please share your thoughts on this.
I would suggest you read the materials here https://learn.nsrc.org/bgp "Multi-Homing" section. I believe you will find more extensive documentation about what you are trying to achieve.
-- Willy Manga
Current thread:
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers, (continued)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Tim Burke (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Randy Bush (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Bryan Fields (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Jean Franco (Dec 26)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Tom Beecher (Dec 27)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Jean Franco (Dec 27)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Sam Roche (Dec 31)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Saku Ytti (Dec 26)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Bryan Fields (Dec 26)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Saku Ytti (Dec 26)
