nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:24:43 +0200
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 at 05:55, Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net> wrote:
vlan {
unit 405 {
family iso {
# holy shit this is important. CISCO and Juniper will not talk unless the
MTU is set
mtu 1492;
}
}
}
This is almost certainly the wrong solution to a real problem. Real problem being, you have MTU mismatch, and the wrong solution is you solve it for one ifa. You almost certainly want the MTU to be fixed in ifl or maybe even ifd. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers, (continued)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Bryan Fields (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Tim Burke (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Randy Bush (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Tim Burke (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Randy Bush (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Bryan Fields (Dec 25)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Jean Franco (Dec 26)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Tom Beecher (Dec 27)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Jean Franco (Dec 27)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Sam Roche (Dec 31)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Saku Ytti (Dec 26)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Bryan Fields (Dec 26)
- Re: Best way to have redundancy announcing on separate routers Saku Ytti (Dec 26)
