nanog mailing list archives
Re: Distributed Router Fabrics
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 09:59:53 -0500
Isn't the solution here the same? Have all LACP member ports in the same chip?
Which any self-respecting operator usually doesn't want to do because of failure domains. On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 9:57 AM Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 16:50, David Sinn <dsinn () uw edu> wrote Actually distributed BFD (not "it's all running on one line card becausecustomers like LACP bundles spread between line cards and that's really hard to distribute reliably), solved.Isn't the solution here the same? Have all LACP member ports in the same chip? -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics, (continued)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Yan Filyurin (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Christopher Morrow (Dec 23)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 24)
- RE: Distributed Router Fabrics Tony Wicks (Dec 24)
