nanog mailing list archives
Re: Distributed Router Fabrics
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:08:56 +0200
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 17:00, Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:
Isn't the solution here the same? Have all LACP member ports in the same chip?Which any self-respecting operator usually doesn't want to do because of failure domains.
I'm just struggling to understand the difference between stack-of-pizza to chassis here. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics, (continued)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Yan Filyurin (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 21)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Christopher Morrow (Dec 23)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Saku Ytti (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Tom Beecher (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Mike Hammett (Dec 24)
- Re: Distributed Router Fabrics Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 24)
- RE: Distributed Router Fabrics Tony Wicks (Dec 24)
