nanog mailing list archives
RE: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024
From: "Howard, Lee via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:22:02 +0000
They do not meet the dictionary definition of "cartel." 1: a written agreement between belligerent nations 2: a combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices 3: a combination of political groups for common action https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cartel "Cartel" is a pretty pejorative term to apply to non-profit organizations providing a coordination service (ensuring uniqueness). Probably also time to note some of NANOG's list guidelines: 1. Posts to NANOG’s Mailing List should be focused on operational and technical content only, as described by the NANOG Bylaws. 8. Posts of a political, philosophical, or legal nature are prohibited. We may be off topic. Lee -----Original Message----- From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 5:57 PM To: Howard, Lee <LeeHoward () hilcostreambank com> Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 This message is from an EXTERNAL SENDER - be CAUTIOUS, particularly with links and attachments. On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:46 PM Howard, Lee <LeeHoward () hilcostreambank com> wrote:
What problem are you trying to solve?
Clarity. Good, bad or indifferent, the RIRs are a cartel of geographic monopolies. As we talk about what they should be tomorrow, it's helpful to understand what they are today. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024, (continued)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Noah (Nov 18)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 18)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 David Conrad via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Noah (Nov 19)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 John Curran (Nov 21)
- RE: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Howard, Lee via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 18)
- RE: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Howard, Lee via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 18)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Tom Beecher (Nov 19)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 19)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Tom Beecher (Nov 19)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Tom Beecher (Nov 20)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 David Conrad via NANOG (Nov 18)
- RE: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 Howard, Lee via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024 William Herrin (Nov 19)
