nanog mailing list archives

Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 07:56:01 -0800

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:28 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:
What is, in your opinion, the perfect scenario by which the functions of the RIRs today could be structured?  The 
'if I could greenfield this today' idea?

I was not asking about updates to ICP-2. I was specifically asking for your greenfield idea, in an attempt to work 
backwards and understand your concerns and perspective.

Hi Tom,

Love the Amazon work-backwards technique but it's not always
instructive. My comments didn't and weren't intended to say much about
what I want the RIRs to change into. I think the RIRs should evolve
into what best serves their myriad communities. That's not something
that comes from a top-down vision, least of all mine. Instead, my
comments spoke to what I want the RIRs to NOT change into. The
perspective I'm coming from is this: what can go wrong, and how do we
head that off so it doesn't?

Does that answer the meta-question you wanted to explore?

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
https://bill.herrin.us/


Current thread: