nanog mailing list archives

Re: 2 undersea cables cut


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:55:58 -0600 (CST)

I think sabotage implies intent. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding () gmail com> 
To: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 9:41:31 AM 
Subject: Re: 2 undersea cables cut 


I'm not sure what hard evidence you might like. There are a small number of methods by which submarine cables become 
damaged - anchors are right up there. In this particular case, there aren't a lot of other possibilities. 


There are only two cable repair ships. It will be a while before there can be forensic examination. 


Dan 


On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:29 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: 







On 11/21/24 14:43, Emile Aben wrote: 


<blockquote>



On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 10:43, Hank Nussbacher < hank () efes iucc ac il > wrote: 


<blockquote>
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/18/europe/undersea-cable-disrupted-germany-finland-intl/index.html 

-Hank 





We looked into how RIPE Atlas saw these cable cuts: 
https://labs.ripe.net/author/emileaben/does-the-internet-route-around-damage-baltic-sea-cable-cuts/ . I hope this 
audience finds that interesting. 
</blockquote>

The rumours floating around about this being sabotage, with no hard evidence supporting such claims, is pretty wild. 

Mark. 

</blockquote>


Current thread: