nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2 undersea cables cut
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:40:34 +0200
On 11/22/24 17:06, Sean Donelan wrote:
On average about 200 submarine cable damage incidents every yearEssentially all submarine cable damage is accidental not sabotage. The few cases of intentional attacks is so rare, that folks in the industry know them as part of the stories passed down.Easy to accuse but takes months to do the forensics. Insurance claims and lawyers,
I was moderating a government-type policy panel on subsea cables a few weeks ago, and there was a deliberate attempt NOT to approach the session from a "security" standpoint, as is typically the case for this kind of audience. The interest was more about subsea network infrastructure resilience and regulatory policy streamlining.
In other words, the "sabotage" angle is played out. That romance is worn out.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut, (continued)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut sronan (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Rubens Kuhl (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Matthew Petach (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Mark Tinka (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Tom Beecher (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Daniel Golding (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Mark Tinka (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Ryan Bagley via NANOG (Nov 22)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Mark Tinka (Nov 21)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Sean Donelan (Nov 22)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Mark Tinka (Nov 22)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Ge DUPIN (Nov 27)
- Re: 2 undersea cables cut Mark Tinka (Nov 21)
