nanog mailing list archives
Re: IEEE MACsec
From: Andriy Bilous <andriy.bilous () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:31:04 +0200
In case you'll find it interesting - all three major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP) support MACSec on their circuits dedicated to customers (restictions may apply). https://aws.amazon.com/directconnect/locations/ https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/interconnect/concepts/choosing-colocation-facilities Can't find the similar table for Azure unfortunately but MACSec is there https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/expressroute/expressroute-about-encryption On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 9:11 PM John Schiel <jschiel () flowtools net> wrote:
I know this is a NANOG forum but curious how widespread usage of MACsec might be. (https://1.ieee802.org/security/802-1ae/).Currently reading the spec but wanted to pose some questions. I'm seeing some pitfalls: 1) May not work over wireless LAN devices? 2) Needs a centralized key server. 3) May not be supportable on all devices? Purported to be faster on the LAN than IPsec because MACsec is on layer 2. Thoughts?
Current thread:
- Re: IEEE MACsec, (continued)
- Re: IEEE MACsec John Schiel (Oct 21)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Tom Beecher (Oct 21)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Crist Clark (Oct 21)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Brandon Martin (Oct 22)
- Re: IEEE MACsec John Schiel (Oct 21)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Tarko Tikan (Oct 22)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Stephen Stuart (Oct 22)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Dave Cohen (Oct 22)
- RE: IEEE MACsec Bertilsson , Björn via NANOG (Oct 23)
- Re: IEEE MACsec John Schiel (Oct 23)
- Re: IEEE MACsec Norman Jester (Oct 25)
