Re: [NANOG] OAM and multiple choice questions

[sronan--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Take a look at TWAMP, which may solve your problems.

Shane

> On Apr 30, 2025, at 7:56 AM, James Bensley via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> latency, and packet loss of the service, and in the case of multi-segment pseudowires check this e2e, and for each 
> segment. We also wanted to provide link-loss forwarding for the services. Finally, we wanted to allow our customers 
> to also use CFM over our service, so we used levels 0-3 internally, and passed levels 4-7 transparently
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/52REISY2NM4B2W64JR5G4XMPD2TUMKNC/