Re: [NANOG] OAM and multiple choice questions

[Aaron1 via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Interesting talk.  I’ve been wanting to dive deeper into this topic for a while.

Do you all know if I can easily enable these types of OAM on my mpls pseudowire/vpls through my mpls cloud in Juniper 
Junos? 

Furthermore, can I also send some sort of OAM on my ENNI vlan subinterfaces to pump synthetic OAM pdu’s through 
neighboring operator clouds towards a remote nid I manage (Accedian)?  This is similar to what someone previously 
mentioned about measuring third-party clouds that are abstracted from their point of view, but can at least get some 
sort of measurement. 

Currently, we plug in Accesian NID’s at various places in the network and run Y.1731 or RFC2544, but as I mentioned in 
the previous paragraph, I would like to insert points along the way in my network and furthermore through my 
neighboring operator clouds as well.

Aaron

> On Apr 30, 2025, at 7:08 PM, sronan--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> Take a look at TWAMP, which may solve your problems.
>
> Shane
>
> > On Apr 30, 2025, at 7:56 AM, James Bensley via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
> >
> > latency, and packet loss of the service, and in the case of multi-segment pseudowires check this e2e, and for each 
> > segment. We also wanted to provide link-loss forwarding for the services. Finally, we wanted to allow our customers 
> > to also use CFM over our service, so we used levels 0-3 internally, and passed levels 4-7 transparently
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/52REISY2NM4B2W64JR5G4XMPD2TUMKNC/

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QNAKVJHDPVBEDC3LRKKS5WUXDMVQ6ALY/