Re: Cisco ASR9902 SNMP polling ... is interesting

[Mel Beckman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Saku,

What is actually appalling is that a member of NANOG calls “bizarre drivel” the honest and sincere attempts by other 
members to help identify the possible problem. There’s no cause to be uncivil, people can disagree without stooping to 
name-calling. 

 -mel

> On Aug 2, 2025, at 11:46 AM, Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 at 21:02, Tom Beecher via NANOG
> <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> > I don't have in depth knowledge of Cisco's SNMP implementations, or even
> > the ASR platform specifically, but if Cisco TAC is telling you this is
> > 'normal', they are completely full of shit, and you should click any and
> > every 'escalate' button you can find.
> >
> > This almost sounds like a default control plane DDOS policer / LPTS ,
> > something like that.
>
> There are various complicated reasons for this, LPTS policer is
> unlikely culprit, but possible. Bug search will show various DDTS with
> poor SNMP performance outcome, most of them are unrelated to LPTS.
>
> But absolutely correct, the right solution is to escalate. In common
> case this would be SE from your account team, who would fight for you
> internally.
>
>
> It is appalling that OP came to nanog after correctly suspecting TAC
> is gaslighting them, some community member piled on with what can only
> be described as a bizarre drivel.
> --
>  ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7KXUNRGFI5OEVSDEDU2OL5VMY5NBGQCV/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CF3QHVTISL6LDFTOWG4E3KK54QEDHUIY/