Re: Noisy prefixes in BGP

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

hi james

> I recall there was a conversation either here on NANOG or maybe it was
> at the IETF, within the last few years, about different NOSes that
> were / were not correctly identifying route updates received with no
> changes to the existing RIB entry, and [not] forwarding the update
> onwards. I’m not sure what came of this.

RFC 9324
and
https://archive.psg.com/220214.nanog-rov-no-rr.pdf

randy