nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective)
From: Tom Mitchell via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 06:55:14 -0700
We've found that the gaming sites moved rapidly to v6 due to CGNAT issues, and that helped, but as they say, can't live with it, can't live without... - Tom On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:22 PM Adam Fathauer via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
At my last $DAYJOB (large financial with several hundred thousand employees), we enabled IPv6, and I focused on our outbound web proxies. Day one, outbound traffic shifted to about 30% native v6 outbound. When I left 3 years ago, we were regularly pushing over 50%. Many of the big sites (Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, LinkedIn) have v6 Internet facing services that just worked. We were also able to enable v6 on a couple of our private connections (non-Internet) with business partners. Eliminating nat vastly simplified troubleshooting! Feel free to reach out to me directly if you have further questions about our experience. Adam ------ Original Message ------ From "Marco Moock via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org> To nanog () lists nanog org Cc "Marco Moock" <mm () dorfdsl de> Date 6/19/2025 4:16:44 PM Subject Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective)Am 19.06.2025 um 14:12:20 Uhr schrieb Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG:I see numerous statistics from Google and similar sources that indicate the percentage of end users who are IPv6 native. What I'm missing are statistics going the other way - what percentage of sites (or endpoints that customers regularly connect to) are IPv6-native, from a total traffic perspective?https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/ This site provides some info about IPv6 enabled web services in certain countries. Although, it doesn't give any info about the amount of traffic. -- Gruß Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1750335140muell () cartoonies org _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EXGKCJRHV5BU5RGHT5NUKOA4YSG35LOK/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/26DJX7WH35FZDUY2B5KUAEFXLPCR5VCG/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/NOZG7RKOGCFJYIA66ANT26Z7QYE64LCV/
Current thread:
- IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Gary E. Miller via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Adam Fathauer via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Tom Mitchell via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) howard stearn via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Adam Fathauer via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) sronan--- via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Niels Bakker via NANOG (Jun 19)
