[NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished

[Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>]

On 3/2/25 2:04 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 10:55 AM Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> wrote:
> > | Subject: [NANOG]Re:
> >
> > Congrats on completing the move to Mailman 3 but is this Subject line
> > mangling truly necessary?
> It has been standard for mailing lists for a quarter of a century now.
> Isn't it time NANOG caught up with mailing list best practices?
FWIW, the old configuration didn't mark up the subject or add a footer 
which has the advantage of not breaking the originating DKIM signature. 
I had always assumed that that was on purpose.

Mike

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/B36ZQBQDNMQ6TINN46VBUAGATVKARGEG/