nanog mailing list archives
[NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished)
From: Sam Thomas via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:28:58 -0600
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 3:39 AM Niels Bakker via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> To: nanog () lists nanog org Cc: Bcc: Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 10:38:20 +0100 Subject: [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) * Bryan () bryanfields net (Bryan Fields) [Mon 03 Mar 2025, 00:47 CET]:The footer is a bit redundant, as mailman3 has the direct link in the "Archived-At:" header now. I'd propose removing the footer and subject prefix, and investigate implementing ARC now that we can support it on mailman3. Keep in mind there's over 12k people on this list, so performance is a bit of concern. What do others think of this?Agreed on both counts. Look at this monstrosity: Subject: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG]Re: Hardware for MPLS/SR network -- Niels.
Text processing is hard. Perhaps what we need is more powerful computers or a new programming language dedicated to the task? Maybe run it through some AI on the way out? Surprised I'm the first (I know of) to complain that List-id: changed. (insert whining about how I had to adjust email filter here) -Sam _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3YCQSHI4ELSWPAGSOP3N5ODW6B4L4H37/
Current thread:
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished, (continued)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished William Herrin (Mar 02)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished Mike Hammett (Mar 02)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished Job Snijders (Mar 02)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished Michael Thomas (Mar 02)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished Florian Weimer (Mar 02)
- [NANOG] DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Bryan Fields (Mar 02)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Niels Bakker via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies Bryan Fields via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies Ray Bellis via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies Niels Bakker via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished Mike Hammett (Mar 02)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Sam Thomas via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Vinny Abello via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Joel Esler via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Don Gould via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Eric C. Miller via NANOG (Mar 06)
- [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished William Herrin (Mar 02)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Matt Corallo via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Mar 03)
- [NANOG] Re: [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Mar 03)
