[NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects

[Chris Woodfield via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Fair point and you appear to be correct. I’ll caveat I’m speaking without concrete data, but I suspect that there are 
enough routes not held in RIR-hosted route servers that dropping the unauthenticated IRRs would be… impactful.

-C

> On Mar 21, 2025, at 08:56, Steven Wallace <ssw () internet2 edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I see SIX uses RADB, among other non-authenticated IRRs, so I assume routes don’t require an authenticated IRR route 
> object?
>
> thanks
>
> steve
> On 21 Mar 2025, at 11:29, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>
> SIX filters on both IRR data and RPKI validation: https://www.seattleix.net/route-servers
>
> -Chris
>
> On Mar 21, 2025, at 06:29, Steven Wallace via NANOG nanog () lists nanog org <mailto:nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Are many/any/most IXP route server operators filtering routes without authenticated (i.e., RIR-hosted) route objects?
>
> thanks,
>
> steve
>
> Steven Wallace
> Director - Routing Integrity
> Internet2
> ssw () internet2 edu <mailto:ssw () internet2 edu>
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/NMPVOLA5USHNCSV5EBORZALEA6A6KN5X/
>
> Steven Wallace
> Director - Routing Integrity
> Internet2
> ssw () internet2 edu <mailto:ssw () internet2 edu>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/MBJWJP5CBFVPW3N3GAOZ5OZMXYGNGDW7/