nanog mailing list archives

[NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects

From: Rubens Kuhl via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:45:15 -0300

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:37 AM Malte Tashiro via NANOG
<nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:


On 3/22/25 01:53, Chris Woodfield via NANOG wrote:

Fair point and you appear to be correct. I’ll caveat I’m speaking without concrete data, but I suspect that there 
are enough routes not held in RIR-hosted route servers that dropping the unauthenticated IRRs would be… impactful.


In the RIPE Connect-WG there are efforts to establish a BCP document to only use RIR IRRs for filtering.


Note that authenticating is not exclusive to RIR IRRs. TC does that
too, using RIR/NIR published objects.


Rubens
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QRBKOFL6WTOJ2GMY4IEOVTDTX5HXUZD6/

Current thread:

[NANOG] Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Steven Wallace via NANOG (Mar 21)
- [NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Chris Woodfield via NANOG (Mar 21)
  - [NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Steven Wallace via NANOG (Mar 21)
    - [NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Chris Woodfield via NANOG (Mar 21)
    - [NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Malte Tashiro via NANOG (Mar 27)
    - [NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Mar 27)
    - [NANOG] Re: Are IXP route server operators filtering routes that lack authenticated route objects Barry O'Donovan (Open Solutions) via NANOG (Mar 27)