Re: trolling

[Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I mean, the reference to its previous existence was from 23 years ago. A
lot has changed since 2002. I'm not totally sure the archeology is really
worth it on this one, especially for a non-binding guideline.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:44 AM Dorn Hetzel <dorn () hetzel org> wrote:

> I'd be curious if anyone knows why the requirement was removed?  Who
> thought that was a necessary and good thing?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 8:42 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <
> nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> > Bill-
> >
> > My committee affiliations are not relevant. That being said if I am ever
> > responding on behalf of one of my committee roles I always make that very
> > clear.
> >
> > The information in question is publicly available on the NANOG website. In
> > fact, you found the link yourself. Any plain reading of that webpage
> > answered your direct question as to what the current guidance is.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 9:34 AM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:16 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:
> > > > > What should we
> > > > > consider to be the current guidance?
> > > >
> > > > You linked to the currently published mailing list guidelines,
> > therefore
> > > > you have already answered your own question. There is no current
> > > > requirement for real names to be used on the mailing list.
> > >
> > > You're on the NANOG Moderation Committee? No? Maybe let someone who is
> > > think about it and offer an answer.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bill Herrin
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/
> > _______________________________________________
> > NANOG mailing list
> >
> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/RWUBHGVRC7Q7WVU5NC27X5ZXFD4SU2ZW/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/M2ENUAJ4RRM4XB266OYLSHBNOELPGUK2/