nanog mailing list archives
Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability?
From: "Dale W. Carder via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:14:02 -0600
Hey John, Thus spake John Kristoff via NANOG (nanog () lists nanog org) on Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:53:43AM -0600:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:14:10 -0600 John Kristoff <jtk () dataplane org> wrote:I'd be interested in hearing if people set a hostname on their BGP routers and send it to peers (internal and/or external). I'm also interested in hearing if you see external peers sending it to you. I know BIRD and FRR support this capability, but I"m not aware of others and I'm guessing it is relatively rare in practice?Most of what I learned about usage was in response to this thread, but I had a few brief responses from others elsewhere. Awareness and interest in it remains lukewarm at best. I soon after realized that ExaBGP supported this capability as well. The original discussion and reaction (pro and con) to the feature is here: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=%22draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability%22> Also note, there is an IANA assignment for it (73). <https://www.iana.org/assignments/capability-codes/capability-codes.xhtml> I'm guessing this capability will just sort of live on forever, rarely used until, if ever, those software implementations decide they want to remove it.
I have to admit I didn't even know it existed. In our measurement/monitoring systems we do record the BGP router ID of every neighbor. This is handy as it should[*] be unique to an AS and can help with troubleshooting for where you may have multiple peering sessions to the same router, particularly across address-families. IMHO, adding a hostname field seems at best duplicative and probably is just another thing to be poorly maintained and go stale over time. Dale [*] that should is lower-case in RFC6286 section 2.1 ...huh _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/N6Y2MJZQNTFPMWIU6F6TAB4WGVVNXODY/
Current thread:
- Do you use or see FQDN capability? John Kristoff via NANOG (Nov 12)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Martin Tonusoo via NANOG (Nov 12)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? jay--- via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Tore Anderson via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Alarig Le Lay via NANOG (Nov 16)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? John Kristoff via NANOG (Nov 17)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 17)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Randy Bush via NANOG (Nov 17)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 17)
