nanog mailing list archives
Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability?
From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:54:09 +0200
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 16:42, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder () es net> wrote:
Prior to RFC6286 router-id had to be globally unique.This must have only been implicit as RFC 1771 is < 1918?
I may not understand what is intended to communicate here. But explicitly RFC1771 needed a globally unique router-id to handle collision on open and some other reasons. RFC6286 modifies these behaviours. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/K4Z5776IYLJZRONUAN662EMXCCPEDDDX/
Current thread:
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability?, (continued)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Martin Tonusoo via NANOG (Nov 12)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? jay--- via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Tore Anderson via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Alarig Le Lay via NANOG (Nov 16)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? John Kristoff via NANOG (Nov 17)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 17)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Randy Bush via NANOG (Nov 17)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability? Dale W. Carder via NANOG (Nov 17)
