nanog mailing list archives

Re: Do you use or see FQDN capability?


From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:54:09 +0200

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 16:42, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder () es net> wrote:

Prior to RFC6286 router-id had to be globally unique.

This must have only been implicit as RFC 1771 is < 1918?

I may not understand what is intended to communicate here.

But explicitly RFC1771 needed a globally unique router-id to handle
collision on open and some other reasons. RFC6286 modifies these
behaviours.
-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/K4Z5776IYLJZRONUAN662EMXCCPEDDDX/


Current thread: