nanog mailing list archives
Re: MD5 is insecure
From: brent saner via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 09:53:33 -0400
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:39 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:
Brent- Yes, IOS is storing the MD5 of the binary key data, not the base64 version. I had that wrong. Still a distinction without a difference. The preimage problem still exists.
Tom- Preimage is not the only attack for MD5. It's a prerequisite if you are *only* sending exactly the attacker key on the wire. Merkle–Damgård checksum algorithms have quite a few fun options in this space if you aren't restricted with a fixed length.
And as you've been clearly ramping up the condescension in the last few messages, I don't feel inclined to debate this with you any further. Take care.
If you're going to be confident, don't be confidently wrong. Best of luck.
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ANK2LRIUW6CH6KICUAHCEKF4XDESJBL3/
Current thread:
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 02)
- RE: MD5 is insecure Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Dan Mahoney via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Dan Mahoney via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: MD5 is insecure Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Chris Woodfield via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
