nanog mailing list archives
Re: MD5 is insecure
From: nanog--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 00:03:20 +0200
On 3/09/25 15:39, Tom Beecher via NANOG wrote:
Brent- Yes, IOS is storing the MD5 of the binary key data, not the base64 version. I had that wrong. Still a distinction without a difference. The preimage problem still exists.
Except it's not a problem, as already discussed.
And as you've been clearly ramping up the condescension in the last few messages, I don't feel inclined to debate this with you any further. Take care.
_______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CHEAQZRPA37DV4STOQHJO5GGYICYXZUY/
Current thread:
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 02)
- RE: MD5 is insecure Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure brent saner via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Dan Mahoney via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Dan Mahoney via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: MD5 is insecure Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Chris Woodfield via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: MD5 is insecure Dorn Hetzel via NANOG (Sep 04)
