Re: Google is not turning up any new peering on IXs?

[Adam Blackington via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Dave Schwartz <https://www.linkedin.com/in/schwartzdavidr/> has the answers
on why in this session from NANOG (*See *
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg-qV6Fktjw; *See also generally *
https://storage.googleapis.com/site-media-prod/meetings/NANOG94/5452/20250609_Schwartz_Inside_Google_Peering__v1.pdf
)

Best,

AB
AS54098


On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 10:03 PM Will OBrien via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:

> We recently turned up a new IXP and I’m going through the motions of
> arranging the usual peers, etc.
> I’m extremely surprised by this one:
>
> Public Peering
>
> Google no longer accepts new peering requests at internet exchanges
> (IXPs). However, Google maintains dedicated connectivity to the internet
> exchanges (IXPs) listed in our PeeringDB entry<
> https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/15169>. We also maintain existing BGP
> sessions across internet exchanges where we are connected. For networks who
> do not meet our PNI requirements Google will serve those networks via
> indirect paths.
>
> I can only presume that someone who doesn’t pay for cross connect fees
> came up with this plan. This feels short sighted at the least. Considering
> the benefits of peering, I have to express some dismay at this disservice
> to the internet in general.
>
> Anyone from Google care to explain what appears to be a willful withdrawal
> of support for the IXP community?
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/77ZSJJ65QQMALALSFHXJD7WAPFA6P2F4/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/XVLSIBVY7NOKON6QHUAC57PKU4YSELTA/