nanog mailing list archives

Re: Google is not turning up any new peering on IXs?


From: Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:40:04 -0400

- Google never segmented Google proper traffic from GCP traffic in their
public peering connectivity.
- GCP traffic creates different traffic patterns that cause congestion
problems to IXes where they haven't expanded capacity enough.
- GCP networking tiers are such that they need to have a shitton of
capacity to transit providers.
- It's cheaper for them to do large, centralized capacity to fewer external
networks than it is to try and constantly manage capacity at all these
individual IXes.
- GCP is Google's fastest growing revenue stream, so everything GCP is more
prioritized.

On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 10:03 PM Will OBrien via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:

We recently turned up a new IXP and I’m going through the motions of
arranging the usual peers, etc.
I’m extremely surprised by this one:

Public Peering

Google no longer accepts new peering requests at internet exchanges
(IXPs). However, Google maintains dedicated connectivity to the internet
exchanges (IXPs) listed in our PeeringDB entry<
https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/15169>. We also maintain existing BGP
sessions across internet exchanges where we are connected. For networks who
do not meet our PNI requirements Google will serve those networks via
indirect paths.

I can only presume that someone who doesn’t pay for cross connect fees
came up with this plan. This feels short sighted at the least. Considering
the benefits of peering, I have to express some dismay at this disservice
to the internet in general.

Anyone from Google care to explain what appears to be a willful withdrawal
of support for the IXP community?
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list

https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/77ZSJJ65QQMALALSFHXJD7WAPFA6P2F4/

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3BX7ACYORR7K5AEROVZK3YDTOIZYU2T6/

Current thread: