Re: Sites unreachable while traversing Dallas IXP

[Nick Hilliard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Mel Beckman via NANOG wrote on 26/09/2025 06:33:
> Instead you configure one of the available hash-based distribution
> functions the two endpoints have in common.
> [...]
> In my own experience, packet loss on Cisco-Juniper LACP links has
> arisen from inconsistent or incompatible configurations.
this analysis is straight down wrong. The hashing algos on each side of 
a LAG bundle are entirely independent of each other and there is no 
problem whatever with using different hashing algos on each side.

Nick
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/G7N6AI3F6EVS4R5PI7PUL2L2BLWTQ5GP/