nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?)
From: Warren Kumari via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:10:08 -0600
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 2:24 PM, Ben Cartwright-Cox <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Depends on what your (from the geoip providers point of view) customers goals are really.
Yup, completely agree. GeoIP's original goals were to get users to the "closest" datacenter to minimize latency (yes, yes, network topology is not the same as geographic topology, but it's often good enough). It has been expanded (co-opted?!) to also get people to a close pizza parlor, and now also is being used (abused?) to implement content restrictions. These were not part of the original design, and so it's not surprising if they don't work well for that... This reminds me of one of my favorite quotes: "I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. " -- maf W A very much non zero amount of geofeeds from providers opportunistically
putting their prefixes in countries they are not, mostly for VPN placement (it sure is a lot nicer to VPN in the USA that everybody thinks is in South Africa, than actually running a VPN in South Africa), but there is also a number of networks that are using geo feeds as a opportunistic way to get their prefix is into countries where copyright holders don't necessarily have a with sending notices to. If the goal of you using a geoip database is to sniff out customers who are accessing content the you are contractually obligated not to serve in their region, well, you would actually prefer your geoip provider do it's homework rather than taking geofeeds at face value. On 1/27/26 17:10, Mike via NANOG wrote: Are you saying you know more about my prefixes than me? _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/RSIX54PARY2PFQPND2RU3BF5IRRQNDKC/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/XGI6G5D4FSQCRQ6PM53VKA6GT736ULYL/
Current thread:
- Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?), (continued)
- Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jan 26)
- Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Callahan Warlick via NANOG (Jan 26)
- Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jan 26)
- Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 26)
- Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Ca By via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Mike via NANOG (Jan 27)
- RE: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jan 27)
- RE: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 27)
- RE: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Warren Kumari via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: Geofeeds are good ??? was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Jan 28)
- Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Jon Lewis via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Peter Folk via NANOG (Jan 27)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 28)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) John Kristoff via NANOG (Jan 28)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 28)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Josh Luthman via NANOG (Jan 28)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are good — was Re: Publishing BGP communties for your network (Re: What's up with BGP communities?) Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Jan 28)
