nanog mailing list archives
Re: pingability of 2600::
From: "Elmar K. Bins via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:48:25 +0100
[Thanks Randy for calling me out there; it is not political for me, more like a continued nuisance. I shouldn't have been so sloppy as not to call out *both* knuckleheads, 6939 and 174.] I also wanted to confirm reachability from 8412 in Vienna, AT. ( ^174 201011 22927 3891 8412$ ) ...and a whole lot of other places that don't use 6939... Elmar, distracted by a cat. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ZYNA45ELDNIVUPEQHGXIXIZIS6MUPHSD/
Current thread:
- pingability of 2600:: Marco Moock via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Brandon Martin via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Marco Moock via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
- RE: pingability of 2600:: Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Brandon Martin via NANOG (Jan 15)
