nanog mailing list archives
Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors?
From: Douglas Fischer via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:02:06 -0300
Perhaps these excellent publications by Justin Pietsch can help you decide: https://medium.com/the-elegant-network/performance-testing-of-commercial-bgp-c3b93424dd6d I suggest reading the entire set of posts. I don't know if anyone has done analyses of this same type recently. If so, I'd like to read them. Em ter., 2 de jun. de 2026 às 18:14, Tom Samplonius via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> escreveu:
Well, while I’m curious about FRR specific characteristics, I think the typical BGP CPU advice still applies: 1. Fastest possible cores. While there are techniques to process BGP in parallel (ex. sharding), BGP often tends to serialize updates. Faster cores are always better for BGP. 2. Virtualization is just a tax. Assume it takes 10% of your performance, which is probably on the high-end for a RR. RRs don’t forward packets, so XDP and DPDK and all that stuff, do not apply. Juniper says their container routing protocol daemon (cRPD): Junos cRPD is designed to maximize routing performance. For example, it is capable of reflecting 10 copies of Internet routes to 1000 BGP peers in less than 60 seconds. I’m curious if FRR can do that, and what hardware that would be. TomOn Jun 2, 2026, at 7:30 AM, Owens, Richard A. via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:I have had this question also before. Also importantly, if you would,what kind of hardware specs do your RR's have and are they physical or virtual?--- Richard Owens Network Automation and Wireless Engineer | Information TechnologyServicesOld Dominion University 4300 Engineering and Computational Sciences Building https://www.odu.edu/its ________________________________ From: fritz--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 10:09 To: nanog () lists nanog org <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: fritz () init7 net <fritz () init7 net> Subject: Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? EXTERNAL to ODU: This email is not from an ODU account. Do not clicklinks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.Hi Tom! We are using FRRouting on Linux VMs as dedicated BGP route reflectorsfor AFs vpnv4, vpnv6 and evpn.Having around 1000 RR clients connected with a handful of L3VPN and afew dozen EVPN instances.We don't keep the full routing table on them, but that should cause noproblem, just throw a bit more memory onto the VMs.BGP works like a charm on FRRouting and is also pretty good onsupporting recent BGP features.We can absolutely recommend it. As a sidenote: IGPs at FRRouting seem to get a bit less love, so don'tbe too sophisticated there...BR, Thomas Senior Network Engineer Init7 (AS13030) _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.nanog.org%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fnanog%40lists.nanog.org%2Fmessage%2F5YPBTLAZTZ2PLG3THWK3R4J45NLLQLER%2F&data=05%7C02%7Crowens%40odu.edu%7C760b744b40b24195c83608dec0b11127%7C48bf86e811a24b8a8cb368d8be2227f3%7C0%7C0%7C639160063895453802%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=se8967J3xTPB4T0YC76aG2J8vFWkPJdiyXudE%2FJ%2FoAI%3D&reserved=0 < https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/5YPBTLAZTZ2PLG3THWK3R4J45NLLQLER/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/G3JYH7XV5L7QXUF3CNZWUAGTCT6MBFFV/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/BMWHVTDOGPJGEZH4X2IYC5PVWMSRCB32/
-- Douglas Fernando Fischer Engº de Controle e Automação _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6JZ6ABP25IEM56TSSYYRENU4GKXVDWCH/
Current thread:
- FRR for BGP route reflectors? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Jun 01)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Evan S. Weiner via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? fritz--- via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Owens, Richard A. via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Bradley Gillette via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Douglas Fischer via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? André Dias via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 04)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Jun 04)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Douglas Fischer via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Owens, Richard A. via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jun 05)
