nanog mailing list archives
Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors?
From: Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 17:57:54 +0200
On 02/06/2026 16:09, fritz--- via NANOG wrote:
As a sidenote: IGPs at FRRouting seem to get a bit less love, so don't be too sophisticated there...
It's one of the reasons we are running OSPF on FRR in lieu of IS-IS.It's possible IS-IS has moved on since I last tried it around 2020, but an IP network is no longer our main production platform (our use-case is a DCN), so I have no incentive to tinker with the current setup.
Mark. _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/R2MCCJ3QVPYEK6LNBCWFBNDGLSGOGHJP/
Current thread:
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors?, (continued)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Owens, Richard A. via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Bradley Gillette via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Douglas Fischer via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? André Dias via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 04)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Jun 04)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Douglas Fischer via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Owens, Richard A. via NANOG (Jun 02)
- Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jun 05)
