nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 flag day
From: John Levine via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: 20 Jun 2026 15:36:41 -0400
It appears that Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> said:
Am 20.06.26 um 08:14 schrieb David Conrad via NANOG:I have some skepticism that a “turn off IPv4 day” mandate from (some) network operators will change things significantly, but I’m frequently wrong.It will impact them if large companies like Google or MS decide that IPv6 is mandatory. Such cases pushed SPF/DKIM, TLS, HTTPS etc.
Those all had significant security benefits. IPv6, not so much. R's, John PS: Yes, I know about IPsec. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CFLZFXA3T2R5727DBXNY5BR3GC3US4GW/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 flag day, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day David Conrad via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day David Conrad via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day John Levine via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Joe Hamelin via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 21)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Arie Vayner via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
