nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 flag day
From: William Herrin via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:02:22 -0700
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 8:14 AM Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Am 18.06.26 um 05:16 schrieb Arie Vayner:The SIP and Gaming use cases are a bit of a strawman argument for thisSIP does not work properly with NAT.
SIP clients work just fine with NAT so long as the SIP registration timer is shorter than the NAT UDP state timeout. SIP servers are another matter, but as I might have mentioned I try not to mix servers and NAT. That's just not a good NAT use case. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/OCNHX2ONURP2OTFGAUGQIWGAYEWU7ZCD/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 flag day, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 flag day David Conrad via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day John Levine via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Joe Hamelin via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 21)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Arie Vayner via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Pedro Prado via NANOG (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 18)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 18)
