nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers
From: Scott Fisher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:35:05 -0400
The takedown was also due to the help of network operators, many of whom are on this list. Huzzah! Thanks, Scott
On Mar 24, 2026, at 1:27 PM, cosmo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: The news is likely a response to recent events. Props go to the FBI Alaska field office! District of Alaska | Authorities disrupt world’s largest IoT DDoS botnets responsible for record breaking attacks targeting victims worldwide | United States Department of Justice https://share.google/oNBQGeRtp05TtSbMI On Tue, Mar 24, 2026, 10:05 AM John Levine via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:It appears that Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> said:Relevant URLs are https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-420034A1.pdf https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist 'Routers^ produced in a foreign country, except routers which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS.' I wonder what 'Routers^' are 'produced' in the US, in such a way that it meaningfully improves security posture.As far as I know, the answer is none. There are plenty of routers designed in the US but they're all built offshore. It would make sense to ask where the software is written, but they don't do that. The conditional approval procedure is absurd. It requires the vendor to commit to manufacture in the U.S. R's, John _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/FSHMKN363Z3R2QSWMPO6F4FIY6FAM7LP/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/N4WOGJW3O3VLHNM2GSUPYZLCQ5RGEULJ/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/PDEZT5ERZUJTGRVGP457F73TJDLR5XY2/
Current thread:
- FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Roy via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Tom Beecher via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Barry Raveendran Greene via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Joe via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Christopher Morrow via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers virendra rode via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Tom Beecher via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers John Levine via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers cosmo via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Scott Fisher via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers cosmo via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Jared Mauch via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Tom Beecher via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers John R. Levine via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Mukund Sivaraman via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 25)
- RE: [External Sender] Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Matt Rienzo via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 25)
