nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers
From: "John R. Levine via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: 24 Mar 2026 17:30:47 -0400
On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, Jared Mauch wrote:
The conditional approval procedure is absurd. It requires the vendor to commit to manufacture in the U.S.I suspect this is why the waiver is really the method, at least for the foreseeable future. Much of this is existing and predates the current administration for those of us who have been watching this space. There’s quite a bit of problems out there with these embedded systems and how they are managed and maintained.
In the documents I don't see any provision for waivers other than conditional approval. People more familiar with FCC process than me say the same, there's no realistic way to get anything approved.
The number of people who don’t want to upgrade firmware because of worries of new problems vs those who really should upgrade because the embedded solution is based on a very old and already exploitable software suite is quite large. I discovered this during a lot of the research into open resolvers done quite some time ago. The number of these embedded platforms that did something odd or were broken was quite big. With the advancements in tools where you can take something like binwalk and a software image to find exploits by using an AI toolset, plus you get the really difficult to patch situations such as this:
Oh, absolutely, the software is awful and there's a lot we can and should do about it. But that's unrelated to where the box is physically assembled. I have a Ubiquiti Edgerouter which as far as I know is designed in the US, and runs software written in the US, but it's assembled in China so it's lucky I already have one.
Regards, John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/UMT6VUWHP3QPOYQVSX2IWLSK3MSSPSPC/
Current thread:
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers, (continued)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Joe via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Christopher Morrow via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers virendra rode via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers John Levine via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers cosmo via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Scott Fisher via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers cosmo via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Jared Mauch via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Tom Beecher via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers John R. Levine via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Mukund Sivaraman via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Saku Ytti via NANOG (Mar 25)
- RE: [External Sender] Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Matt Rienzo via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 25)
