nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 09:00:46 +0200
Am 30.04.26 um 22:22 schrieb Gary Sparkes via NANOG:
Much simpler just to NAT between A B C D and E's networks and do gradual segment renumbering, and much less infrastructure/hardware to do so as well.
That is a PITA. In certain cases you want interconnection between the systems and then the NAT is just another annoying thing in the process.
-- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan () stinkedores dorfdsl de _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ZMPWHIAQOAHDTLYYUKST6WZWE4OZCIBG/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Marco Moock via NANOG (May 01)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (May 01)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 01)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 01)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Marco Moock via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 01)
