nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
From: sronan--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2026 19:31:31 -0400
And how will you update the myriad of operating systems and embedded devices which haven’t received updates in years but are still running inside enterprises?
On May 2, 2026, at 6:43 PM, Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: Marco, Here's how I see it going. 1. The OS upgrade is transparent. 2. The firewalls at the edge upgrade and IPv8 zone features. 3. The 10.x can now be split and operated by area. 4. People turn that on, and Zone Server to interoperate better inside regardless of the Internet status. 5. Internally it becomes part of the OS. 6. Even just implementing a Zone Server, and let people manage 10.x by area will be a great option. JamieOn Sat, May 2, 2026 at 10:08 AM Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:Am 02.05.26 um 14:56 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: And what isn't backwards compatible if you know of something. I'm all ears.Your proposal isn't too, as there is nothing that can be backwards compatible regarding IPv4-only nodes in an IPv4-only environment with admins who do not want any change. -- Gruß Marco Muell und Spam bitte an abfalleimer2000 () stinkedores dorfdsl de [abfalleimer2000 () stinkedores dorfdsl de] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/ message/VKXJGPM2V5GFQ4I6EYJETEEQKIP32D4G/ [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/VKXJGPM2V5GFQ4I6EYJETEEQKIP32D4G/][] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EFFNMZI24ECZ2ECCV2WRM7DOTSH2R2QS/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/FS5HUHMNBYTBPTC5DRDXZG44YWLLARY3/
Current thread:
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF, (continued)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 01)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Marco Moock via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (May 01)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Marco Moock via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF sronan--- via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Marco Moock via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF sronan--- via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Kevin Tillery via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF andrew--- via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (May 03)
