oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: Best practices for signature verifcation
From: Collin Funk <collin.funk1 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 14:49:53 -0800
Hi Simon, Simon Josefsson <simon () josefsson org> writes:
6) Sigstore and Sigsum. (I hope I provoke both camps here too :)) These are modern designs that realize that signatures without transparency is not effective against practical attacks. Reasonable well specified, although lacking in multiple implementations and PQ options. Sigstore suffer from complexity and its focus on container security. Sigsum suffer from lack of non-Go implementations and MIME integration.
Doesn't Sigstore require a centralized Rekor instance? That was the impression I based on a very brief look at it previously. Collin
Current thread:
- Best practices for signature verifcation Demi Marie Obenour (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Best practices for signature verifcation kf503bla (Dec 29)
- Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Steffen Nurpmeso (Dec 29)
- Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Max Jonas Werner (Dec 29)
- Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Simon Josefsson (Dec 31)
- Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Steffen Nurpmeso (Dec 31)
- Re: Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Collin Funk (Dec 31)
- Re: Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Demi Marie Obenour (Dec 31)
- Re: Best practices for signature verifcation kf503bla (Dec 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Eli Schwartz (Dec 30)
- Re: Re: Best practices for signature verifcation Eli Schwartz (Dec 30)
