oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 () cs auckland ac nz>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 02:02:01 +0000
Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith () oracle com> writes:
2) The GNOME security team will no longer forward vulnerability reports to projects that ban AI-generated content, since most reports they get these days have at least some AI-generated content.
So you've got a bunch of projects where people are clamoring for them to reject anything that might have been touched by AI, and another bunch of projects where people have decided to refuse to take part in anything that rejects things that have been touched by AI. Just to sort things out in my mind, which of the two is the People's Front of Judea and which is the Judean People's Front? Peter.
Current thread:
- Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Alan Coopersmith (Jul 30)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Peter Gutmann (Jul 30)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Aaron Rainbolt (Jul 31)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking David A. Wheeler (Jul 31)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Sebastian Pipping (Jul 31)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Eli Schwartz (Jul 31)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Yves-Alexis Perez (Aug 03)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking David A. Wheeler (Aug 03)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Emily Shepherd (Aug 03)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Aaron Rainbolt (Aug 03)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Sebastian Pipping (Aug 03)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Greg KH (Aug 03)
- Re: Some Changes to GNOME Security Tracking Peter Gutmann (Jul 30)
