Secure Coding mailing list archives

Harvard vs. von Neumann


From: ljknews at mac.com (ljknews)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:46:19 -0400

At 9:00 AM -0400 6/11/07, Gary McGraw wrote:

If we assumed perfection at the implementation level (through better
languages, say), then we would end up solving roughly 50% of the
software security problem.

Clearly we need to make some progress at the architecture/design level
to attain reasonable levels of software security.

Perfect languages won't solve the software security problem.

And neither will perfect designs.

Both approaches needed.

But a large percentage of failures that result from weak languages are
already categorized in standard terms like "buffer overflow".
-- 
Larry Kilgallen


Current thread: